Comments on Functional Fun: Anyone for a Slice of LINQ?

return items.Select((val, i) => new...

2011-07-26T08:11:47.584+01:00

return items.Select((val, i) => new {Value = val, Index = i})
.GroupBy(item => item.Index/bucketSize)
.Select(item => item.Select(val => val.Value));

Simples

> gastronomic analogy I prefer using a metaphor...

2010-07-08T23:41:01.280+01:00

> gastronomic analogy
I prefer using a metaphor of "confectionary delights".

Anonymous' for loop is pretty creative. Thanks for share.

shoter version does not yield 'crumb'.

2010-03-15T09:51:12.233Z

shoter version does not yield 'crumb'.

Here is a shoter version for (IEnumerable<T>...

2009-11-03T12:01:35.256Z

Here is a shoter version

for (IEnumerable<T> header = sequence.Take(maxItemsPerSlice), tail = sequence.Skip(maxItemsPerSlice);
header.Count() == maxItemsPerSlice;
header=tail.Take( maxItemsPerSlice), tail = tail.Skip(maxItemsPerSlice))
{
yield return header;
}

Anonymous,
The magic is in an invisible call...

2008-08-26T10:14:00.000+01:00

Anonymous,
The magic is in an invisible call to a WithSpellingCorrected() extension method ;-)

Sam

Cool, evidently there's a magic spell-checker in l...

2008-08-26T04:20:00.000+01:00

Cool, evidently there's a magic spell-checker in linq as well. The string array has it as 'Cabury' but it comes in the output as 'Cadbury'... amazing! ;-)

Comments on Functional Fun: Anyone for a Slice of LINQ?

return items.Select((val, i) => new...

> gastronomic analogy I prefer using a metaphor...

shoter version does not yield 'crumb'.

Here is a shoter version for (IEnumerable<T>...

Anonymous, The magic is in an invisible call...

Cool, evidently there's a magic spell-checker in l...

Anonymous,
The magic is in an invisible call...